NASA Science Curiosity Mission News Conference

0
(0)

Similar Posts:

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

As you found this post useful...

Follow us on social media!

We are sorry that this post was not useful for you!

Let us improve this post!

Tell us how we can improve this post?

10 Comments

  1. The rich spend more money on booze and cigarettes…its why they're rich duh. I like your qualification "military" contractors. Are you implying that the military is responsible in some way for man to put a vehicle bot on Mars? What a sorry, warped view you must have.

  2. Not as a proportion of their income . . . would you have preferred 'Defense' contractor then? The technology for putting the rover in its landing ellipse is entirely an elaboration of the same technologies that put an ICBM on target with a 5m CEP. Military investments in aerospace engineering made that possible, I'm sorry that that doesn't fit in with the prog narrative you've developed for yourself. Perhaps your view is the one that's warped?

  3. all my possessions for my entire life up to now ISN'T a drop in the bucket compared to 2 POINT FIVE BILLION DOLLARS!! (sorry for the caps but… dude… 2.5 billion dollars)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *